Mauricio Gonzalez’s sculpture is a complete aesthetic response to the state and condition of Florida. By creating his pieces, which are both bodies and sites, out of the physical detritus of the housing crisis, Gonzalez inserts his practice between Modernist social planning and the attempted revival of subjective humanism. Just as Florida is caught in the eternal sway between boom and bust (and the similarly alternating process of self-definition), Gonzalez’s work balances between levity and collapse. He uses surfaces to create the illusion of structural integrity. There are whimsical arabesques that are nailed into place.
When approaching this work, one must make a distinction between his materials, which usually originated from construction projects, and objects, as ontologically complete–in and of themselves. Moreover, there’s a problem with found materials. It implies randomness, and with that, a lack of purpose bordering on gullibility. Finding something is usually met with a naive glee reserved for children on Easter Sunday. But what if there was no surprise involved? What if the objects in question weren’t passively found, but were very purposefully scavenged from foreclosed lots around Miami, as evidence of the larger system that led to them being lost in the first place?
In discarding bits of the natural suburban environment, the former owners of these materials do not just disintegrate the physical item (the home, the automobile, the Fisherprice playset), they lay waste to its symbolic import as well – that of the secure and permanent home. This is where Gonzalez begins, with impermanence. These pieces do not seem like they will survive the winter. The materials will decompose, they will begin to sag. In this regard, they come to resemble the body. In her essay Ecce Homo, Isabelle Graw said that “the anthropomorphic return is emblematic of life under the conditions of celebrity culture, where products become persons, and persons are themselves commodified.” She continues to discuss the work of Rachel Harrison, whose sculptures are both objects and subjects. This trend is apparent in the work of Mauricio Gonzalez, whose sculpture additionally recalls a place (specific or generic, it doesn’t matter) and presents a trajectory of its inevitable decline.
Mauricio Gonzalez was born in Havana. His first solo exhibition at Fredric Snitzer Gallery will be in January.










2 comments
Art Mogul says:
Dec 19, 2011
Amazing! What brilliant work! The talent here is incredible. Snitzer is showing us the best sculptures in the world. The way the pole sits on the flag is an admirable feat of craftmanship. The way the expandable foam is exposed is a touch of genius. These works make us think on deep levels commenting on garage sales items and thrift shop things. These are the type of works that take 100′s of hours to make. Snitzer is such a talent such among many things.
Hunter says:
Dec 20, 2011
Hey Art Mogul,
Thanks for your comment. While I’m not a fan of your willingness to dismiss a type of sculpture, your comment is definitely valuable. Insisting that work be strong in craftmanship, time consuming, and even touched by genius, is a pretty conservative, if not archaic, idea of what art should be. Also, this post isn’t about Snitzer, but Mauricio Gonzalez. By talking about the work through the gallery where one can buy it, I think you’re unwittingly perpetuating the exact system (art as cheap, quick, replaceable product) that Gonzalez’s sculpture critiques.